http://www.factmatters.org:80/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=The_Hill%E3%80%90%E5%8F%96%E6%B6%88%E8%B5%84%E6%A0%BC%E8%BF%98%E6%98%AF%E4%B8%8D%E5%8F%96%E6%B6%88%E8%B5%84%E6%A0%BC%EF%BC%9A_%E6%9C%80%E9%AB%98%E6%B3%95%E9%99%A2%E9%9D%A2%E4%B8%B4_%22%E7%AC%91%E5%A3%B0%E6%B5%8B%E9%AA%8C%E2%80%9C%E3%80%91
The Hill【取消资格还是不取消资格： 最高法院面临 "笑声测验“】 - Revision history
2026-10-23T00:57:42Z
Revision history for this page on the wiki
MediaWiki 1.41.0
http://www.factmatters.org:80/index.php?title=The_Hill%E3%80%90%E5%8F%96%E6%B6%88%E8%B5%84%E6%A0%BC%E8%BF%98%E6%98%AF%E4%B8%8D%E5%8F%96%E6%B6%88%E8%B5%84%E6%A0%BC%EF%BC%9A_%E6%9C%80%E9%AB%98%E6%B3%95%E9%99%A2%E9%9D%A2%E4%B8%B4_%22%E7%AC%91%E5%A3%B0%E6%B5%8B%E9%AA%8C%E2%80%9C%E3%80%91&diff=1143&oldid=prev
Lychee at 02:40, 29 January 2024
2024-01-29T02:40:34Z
<p></p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 22:40, 28 January 2024</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l44">Line 44:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 44:</td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[Category:US Election]]</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[Category:US Election]]</div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"> <font color="grey">当前位置：</font>[[时政文萃 | 首页]]<font color="grey"> &rarr; </font>[[美国大选_U.S._Elections | 美国大选]]<font color="grey"> &rarr; </font></ins></div></td></tr>
</table>
Lychee
http://www.factmatters.org:80/index.php?title=The_Hill%E3%80%90%E5%8F%96%E6%B6%88%E8%B5%84%E6%A0%BC%E8%BF%98%E6%98%AF%E4%B8%8D%E5%8F%96%E6%B6%88%E8%B5%84%E6%A0%BC%EF%BC%9A_%E6%9C%80%E9%AB%98%E6%B3%95%E9%99%A2%E9%9D%A2%E4%B8%B4_%22%E7%AC%91%E5%A3%B0%E6%B5%8B%E9%AA%8C%E2%80%9C%E3%80%91&diff=1039&oldid=prev
Lychee at 23:45, 28 January 2024
2024-01-28T23:45:03Z
<p></p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 19:45, 28 January 2024</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1">Line 1:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><font color="grey">当前位置：</font>[[时政文萃 | 首页]]<font color="grey"> &rarr; </font>[[美国大选_U.S._Elections | 美国大选]]<font color="grey"> &rarr; </font></div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"> </ins><font color="grey">当前位置：</font>[[时政文萃 | 首页]]<font color="grey"> &rarr; </font>[[美国大选_U.S._Elections | 美国大选]]<font color="grey"> &rarr; </font></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div> </div></td><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-added"></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>'''The Hill【取消资格还是不取消资格： 最高法院面临 "笑声测验“】'''</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>'''The Hill【取消资格还是不取消资格： 最高法院面临 "笑声测验“】'''</div></td></tr>
</table>
Lychee
http://www.factmatters.org:80/index.php?title=The_Hill%E3%80%90%E5%8F%96%E6%B6%88%E8%B5%84%E6%A0%BC%E8%BF%98%E6%98%AF%E4%B8%8D%E5%8F%96%E6%B6%88%E8%B5%84%E6%A0%BC%EF%BC%9A_%E6%9C%80%E9%AB%98%E6%B3%95%E9%99%A2%E9%9D%A2%E4%B8%B4_%22%E7%AC%91%E5%A3%B0%E6%B5%8B%E9%AA%8C%E2%80%9C%E3%80%91&diff=926&oldid=prev
Lychee at 22:42, 28 January 2024
2024-01-28T22:42:07Z
<p></p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 18:42, 28 January 2024</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1">Line 1:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><font color="grey">当前位置：</font>[[时政文萃 | 首页]]<font color="grey"> &rarr; </font>[[美国大选_U.S._Elections | 美国大选]]</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><font color="grey">当前位置：</font>[[时政文萃 | 首页]]<font color="grey"> &rarr; </font>[[美国大选_U.S._Elections | 美国大选]]<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"><font color="grey"> &rarr; </font></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr>
</table>
Lychee
http://www.factmatters.org:80/index.php?title=The_Hill%E3%80%90%E5%8F%96%E6%B6%88%E8%B5%84%E6%A0%BC%E8%BF%98%E6%98%AF%E4%B8%8D%E5%8F%96%E6%B6%88%E8%B5%84%E6%A0%BC%EF%BC%9A_%E6%9C%80%E9%AB%98%E6%B3%95%E9%99%A2%E9%9D%A2%E4%B8%B4_%22%E7%AC%91%E5%A3%B0%E6%B5%8B%E9%AA%8C%E2%80%9C%E3%80%91&diff=567&oldid=prev
Lychee at 16:19, 20 January 2024
2024-01-20T16:19:20Z
<p></p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 12:19, 20 January 2024</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1">Line 1:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"><font color="grey">当前位置：</font>[[时政文萃 | 首页]]<font color="grey"> &rarr; </font>[[美国大选_U.S._Elections | 美国大选]]</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>'''The Hill【取消资格还是不取消资格： 最高法院面临 "笑声测验“】'''</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>'''The Hill【取消资格还是不取消资格： 最高法院面临 "笑声测验“】'''</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr>
</table>
Lychee
http://www.factmatters.org:80/index.php?title=The_Hill%E3%80%90%E5%8F%96%E6%B6%88%E8%B5%84%E6%A0%BC%E8%BF%98%E6%98%AF%E4%B8%8D%E5%8F%96%E6%B6%88%E8%B5%84%E6%A0%BC%EF%BC%9A_%E6%9C%80%E9%AB%98%E6%B3%95%E9%99%A2%E9%9D%A2%E4%B8%B4_%22%E7%AC%91%E5%A3%B0%E6%B5%8B%E9%AA%8C%E2%80%9C%E3%80%91&diff=531&oldid=prev
Wiki user at 14:58, 20 January 2024
2024-01-20T14:58:52Z
<p></p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 10:58, 20 January 2024</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l40">Line 40:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 40:</td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>To disqualify or not to disqualify: The Supreme Court confronts the ‘laugh test’<br/></div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>To disqualify or not to disqualify: The Supreme Court confronts the ‘laugh test’<br/></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/4394601-to-disqualify-or-not-to-disqualify-the-supreme-court-confronts-the-laugh-test/</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/4394601-to-disqualify-or-not-to-disqualify-the-supreme-court-confronts-the-laugh-test/</div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[[Category:US Election]]</ins></div></td></tr>
</table>
Wiki user
http://www.factmatters.org:80/index.php?title=The_Hill%E3%80%90%E5%8F%96%E6%B6%88%E8%B5%84%E6%A0%BC%E8%BF%98%E6%98%AF%E4%B8%8D%E5%8F%96%E6%B6%88%E8%B5%84%E6%A0%BC%EF%BC%9A_%E6%9C%80%E9%AB%98%E6%B3%95%E9%99%A2%E9%9D%A2%E4%B8%B4_%22%E7%AC%91%E5%A3%B0%E6%B5%8B%E9%AA%8C%E2%80%9C%E3%80%91&diff=70&oldid=prev
Kevin at 00:11, 9 January 2024
2024-01-09T00:11:29Z
<p></p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 20:11, 8 January 2024</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l37">Line 37:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 37:</td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>'''詹姆斯-D-齐林（James D. Zirin）'''是作家和法律分析家，曾任纽约南区联邦检察官。他还是公共电视台脱口秀节目和播客《与詹姆斯-齐林对话》的主持人。<br/><br/></div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>'''詹姆斯-D-齐林（James D. Zirin）'''是作家和法律分析家，曾任纽约南区联邦检察官。他还是公共电视台脱口秀节目和播客《与詹姆斯-齐林对话》的主持人。<br/><br/></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">原文链接：（中文翻译出自翻译软件，全部内容须以原文为准）</del><br/></div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">'''原文链接：'''（中文翻译出自翻译软件，全部内容须以原文为准）</ins><br/></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>To disqualify or not to disqualify: The Supreme Court confronts the ‘laugh test’<br/></div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>To disqualify or not to disqualify: The Supreme Court confronts the ‘laugh test’<br/></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/4394601-to-disqualify-or-not-to-disqualify-the-supreme-court-confronts-the-laugh-test/</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/4394601-to-disqualify-or-not-to-disqualify-the-supreme-court-confronts-the-laugh-test/</div></td></tr>
</table>
Kevin
http://www.factmatters.org:80/index.php?title=The_Hill%E3%80%90%E5%8F%96%E6%B6%88%E8%B5%84%E6%A0%BC%E8%BF%98%E6%98%AF%E4%B8%8D%E5%8F%96%E6%B6%88%E8%B5%84%E6%A0%BC%EF%BC%9A_%E6%9C%80%E9%AB%98%E6%B3%95%E9%99%A2%E9%9D%A2%E4%B8%B4_%22%E7%AC%91%E5%A3%B0%E6%B5%8B%E9%AA%8C%E2%80%9C%E3%80%91&diff=69&oldid=prev
Kevin at 00:10, 9 January 2024
2024-01-09T00:10:32Z
<p></p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 20:10, 8 January 2024</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l33">Line 33:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 33:</td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>不民主？这正是制定第 3 条的原因，以防止像特朗普这样专制地试图从人民手中夺走决定权的人担任公职。<br/><br/></div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>不民主？这正是制定第 3 条的原因，以防止像特朗普这样专制地试图从人民手中夺走决定权的人担任公职。<br/><br/></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>最高法院将于 2 月 8 日对此案进行口头辩论，尽管他们有右翼的倾向，但他们将很难从这一案件中脱身，并做出一个能通过笑声检验的判决。<br/><br/></div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>最高法院将于 2 月 8 日对此案进行口头辩论，尽管他们有右翼的倾向，但他们将很难从这一案件中脱身，并做出一个能通过笑声检验的判决。<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"><br/><br/></ins><br/><br/></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>詹姆斯-D-齐林（James D. <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Zirin）是作家和法律分析家，曾任纽约南区联邦检察官。他还是公共电视台脱口秀节目和播客《与詹姆斯</del>-齐林对话》的主持人。<br/><br/></div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">'''</ins>詹姆斯-D-齐林（James D. <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Zirin）'''是作家和法律分析家，曾任纽约南区联邦检察官。他还是公共电视台脱口秀节目和播客《与詹姆斯</ins>-齐林对话》的主持人。<br/><br/></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>原文链接：（中文翻译出自翻译软件，全部内容须以原文为准）<br/></div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>原文链接：（中文翻译出自翻译软件，全部内容须以原文为准）<br/></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>To disqualify or not to disqualify: The Supreme Court confronts the ‘laugh test’<br/></div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>To disqualify or not to disqualify: The Supreme Court confronts the ‘laugh test’<br/></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/4394601-to-disqualify-or-not-to-disqualify-the-supreme-court-confronts-the-laugh-test/</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/4394601-to-disqualify-or-not-to-disqualify-the-supreme-court-confronts-the-laugh-test/</div></td></tr>
</table>
Kevin
http://www.factmatters.org:80/index.php?title=The_Hill%E3%80%90%E5%8F%96%E6%B6%88%E8%B5%84%E6%A0%BC%E8%BF%98%E6%98%AF%E4%B8%8D%E5%8F%96%E6%B6%88%E8%B5%84%E6%A0%BC%EF%BC%9A_%E6%9C%80%E9%AB%98%E6%B3%95%E9%99%A2%E9%9D%A2%E4%B8%B4_%22%E7%AC%91%E5%A3%B0%E6%B5%8B%E9%AA%8C%E2%80%9C%E3%80%91&diff=68&oldid=prev
Kevin at 00:09, 9 January 2024
2024-01-09T00:09:25Z
<p></p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 20:09, 8 January 2024</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l3">Line 3:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 3:</td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>詹姆斯-D-齐林（James D. Zirin），评论撰稿人 | 2024 年 1 月 8 日</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>詹姆斯-D-齐林（James D. Zirin），评论撰稿人 | 2024 年 1 月 8 日</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>右翼的最高法院正陷入窘境，不知该如何裁决特朗普被取消资格一案，同时又能保住仅存的公信力。法院刚刚投票决定复审科罗拉多州最高法院的判决，但它其实并不想这样做。</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>右翼的最高法院正陷入窘境，不知该如何裁决特朗普被取消资格一案，同时又能保住仅存的公信力。法院刚刚投票决定复审科罗拉多州最高法院的判决，但它其实并不想这样做。<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"><br/><br/></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>谁将参加总统选举是一个政治问题，而且--尽管法院在本学期已涉足两起特朗普案、两起堕胎案、一起1月6日阻挠案、五起第一修正案/社交媒体案、五起挑战 "深层国家 "深度的行政法案、两起重大枪支案、一起种族选区划分案、臭氧污染规则案和三起财产权纠纷案--但法院通常不喜欢卷入政治纷争。</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>谁将参加总统选举是一个政治问题，而且--尽管法院在本学期已涉足两起特朗普案、两起堕胎案、一起1月6日阻挠案、五起第一修正案/社交媒体案、五起挑战 "深层国家 "深度的行政法案、两起重大枪支案、一起种族选区划分案、臭氧污染规则案和三起财产权纠纷案--但法院通常不喜欢卷入政治纷争。<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"><br/><br/></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>在这起案件中，受到道德挑战的法院已经受到损害。大法官克拉伦斯-托马斯（Clarence Thomas）除非回避，否则已经妥协--他的妻子与 1 月 6 日的叛乱有关。大法官布雷特-卡瓦诺（Brett Kavanaugh）已经妥协；特朗普的律师声称卡瓦诺因其任命而欠了特朗普一大笔钱，暗示前总统已将他收入囊中。毕竟，特朗普认为我们是一个人的政府，而不是法律的政府。</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>在这起案件中，受到道德挑战的法院已经受到损害。大法官克拉伦斯-托马斯（Clarence Thomas）除非回避，否则已经妥协--他的妻子与 1 月 6 日的叛乱有关。大法官布雷特-卡瓦诺（Brett Kavanaugh）已经妥协；特朗普的律师声称卡瓦诺因其任命而欠了特朗普一大笔钱，暗示前总统已将他收入囊中。毕竟，特朗普认为我们是一个人的政府，而不是法律的政府。<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"><br/><br/></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>但最高法院不得不批准。我们不能让国内选举出现混乱，一些州让特朗普留在选票上，另一些州却把他踢出局。美国需要一个全国统一的规则。</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>但最高法院不得不批准。我们不能让国内选举出现混乱，一些州让特朗普留在选票上，另一些州却把他踢出局。美国需要一个全国统一的规则。<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"><br/><br/></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>六位由共和党任命的大法官在对宪法的理论解释上自诩为 "原创论者"、文本论者和严格的解释论者。如果他们诚实地忠于自己的信仰，他们就会在一致同意的临时意见中取消特朗普的资格。</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>六位由共和党任命的大法官在对宪法的理论解释上自诩为 "原创论者"、文本论者和严格的解释论者。如果他们诚实地忠于自己的信仰，他们就会在一致同意的临时意见中取消特朗普的资格。<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"><br/><br/></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>第 14 修正案第 3 条的文本、结构、历史和原始理解完全剥夺了特朗普的资格。</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>第 14 修正案第 3 条的文本、结构、历史和原始理解完全剥夺了特朗普的资格。<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"><br/><br/></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>那么下坡道是什么呢？最高法院可以通过认定特朗普 "参与叛乱 "的证据不足来处理此案。但这样的结论将令人难以置信。我们不需要在科罗拉多州进行为期五天的审判，就能通过 "明确且令人信服的证据 "确定这一点--我们都在全国电视上看到了。推文、演讲和行为都毫无疑问地证明了这一点。特朗普被取消了任职资格。</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>那么下坡道是什么呢？最高法院可以通过认定特朗普 "参与叛乱 "的证据不足来处理此案。但这样的结论将令人难以置信。我们不需要在科罗拉多州进行为期五天的审判，就能通过 "明确且令人信服的证据 "确定这一点--我们都在全国电视上看到了。推文、演讲和行为都毫无疑问地证明了这一点。特朗普被取消了任职资格。<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"><br/><br/></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>第3条并未将总统作为可能被取消资格的官员，但第14修正案的历史清楚地表明，制宪者有意将第3条适用于总统。一个宣誓成为联邦土地估价师的叛乱分子会被取消资格，而一个渴望担任国家最高职位的叛乱分子却不会被取消资格，这又有什么意义呢？此外，历史上有一件事是清楚的： 第 14 条修正案的制定者并不希望杰斐逊-戴维斯成为美国总统。</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>第3条并未将总统作为可能被取消资格的官员，但第14修正案的历史清楚地表明，制宪者有意将第3条适用于总统。一个宣誓成为联邦土地估价师的叛乱分子会被取消资格，而一个渴望担任国家最高职位的叛乱分子却不会被取消资格，这又有什么意义呢？此外，历史上有一件事是清楚的： 第 14 条修正案的制定者并不希望杰斐逊-戴维斯成为美国总统。<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"><br/><br/></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>法院可以说，总统职位不是 "美国的......职位"，也不是 "美国的官员"，但这样的结论无法通过埃琳娜-卡根大法官（Elena Kagan）称之为 "笑声测试 "的无定形标准。正如科罗拉多州最高法院所指出的，《宪法》中有 25 次提到总统是官员或担任职务。</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>法院可以说，总统职位不是 "美国的......职位"，也不是 "美国的官员"，但这样的结论无法通过埃琳娜-卡根大法官（Elena Kagan）称之为 "笑声测试 "的无定形标准。正如科罗拉多州最高法院所指出的，《宪法》中有 25 次提到总统是官员或担任职务。<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"><br/><br/></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>他们可以说，特朗普之前的宪法宣誓是 "维护、保护和捍卫 "宪法，而不是 "支持 "宪法。但 19 世纪的字典将 "捍卫 "与 "支持 "同义，既然特朗普无论如何都想终止宪法，那么他的论点就没有区别了。</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>他们可以说，特朗普之前的宪法宣誓是 "维护、保护和捍卫 "宪法，而不是 "支持 "宪法。但 19 世纪的字典将 "捍卫 "与 "支持 "同义，既然特朗普无论如何都想终止宪法，那么他的论点就没有区别了。<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"><br/><br/></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>大法官们可以说第 14 条修正案不是自动执行的，它需要国会法案来取消起义宣誓人的资格。但这有悖于内战修正案（第 13、14 和 15 条）的结构和历史。如果在《宪法》解放奴隶或取消学校种族隔离之后，国会可以推翻《宪法》对各州的限制，将奴隶制或 "吉姆-克罗 "制度强加于全国其他地区，那将是荒谬的。</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>大法官们可以说第 14 条修正案不是自动执行的，它需要国会法案来取消起义宣誓人的资格。但这有悖于内战修正案（第 13、14 和 15 条）的结构和历史。如果在《宪法》解放奴隶或取消学校种族隔离之后，国会可以推翻《宪法》对各州的限制，将奴隶制或 "吉姆-克罗 "制度强加于全国其他地区，那将是荒谬的。<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"><br/><br/></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>此外，第 3 条规定，参众两院三分之二多数可以取消取消资格的规定。要求国会以绝对多数通过取消资格，但要求三分之二多数通过才能取消资格，这有什么意义呢？而且，取消资格条款难道不意味着其他人，如州官员或州法院，可以取消叛乱分子的投票资格，但需要国会三分之二多数来取消这一资格吗？</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>此外，第 3 条规定，参众两院三分之二多数可以取消取消资格的规定。要求国会以绝对多数通过取消资格，但要求三分之二多数通过才能取消资格，这有什么意义呢？而且，取消资格条款难道不意味着其他人，如州官员或州法院，可以取消叛乱分子的投票资格，但需要国会三分之二多数来取消这一资格吗？<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"><br/><br/></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>以特朗普前副检察长诺埃尔-弗朗西斯科（Noel Francisco）为首的 "法庭之友"（"friends of the court" who submitted a brief）提出了最新的 "踢皮球 "论点，即第 3 条取消的是叛乱者的任职资格，而不是竞选资格，因此各州不能禁止特朗普参加投票，除非他当选，在这种情况下，他不能宣誓就职。这就意味着，16 岁的年轻人、在外国出生的人或两次当选的巴拉克-奥巴马都有资格出现在总统选举的选票上--只是如果当选，他们不能任职。我想象过首席大法官罗伯茨拒绝为这样一位有污点的当选总统主持就职宣誓。</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>以特朗普前副检察长诺埃尔-弗朗西斯科（Noel Francisco）为首的 "法庭之友"（"friends of the court" who submitted a brief）提出了最新的 "踢皮球 "论点，即第 3 条取消的是叛乱者的任职资格，而不是竞选资格，因此各州不能禁止特朗普参加投票，除非他当选，在这种情况下，他不能宣誓就职。这就意味着，16 岁的年轻人、在外国出生的人或两次当选的巴拉克-奥巴马都有资格出现在总统选举的选票上--只是如果当选，他们不能任职。我想象过首席大法官罗伯茨拒绝为这样一位有污点的当选总统主持就职宣誓。<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"><br/><br/></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>最后，还有一种论点认为，这只是糟糕的政策，不给叛乱分子投票是不民主的。但这恰恰是原创主义者一再拒绝的论点。正如他们的守护神安东宁-斯卡利亚大法官（Justice Antonin Scalia）所说，宪法并不是我所希望的那种意思；不存在活着的宪法。宪法是死的。它意味着当时社会最初的理解。</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>最后，还有一种论点认为，这只是糟糕的政策，不给叛乱分子投票是不民主的。但这恰恰是原创主义者一再拒绝的论点。正如他们的守护神安东宁-斯卡利亚大法官（Justice Antonin Scalia）所说，宪法并不是我所希望的那种意思；不存在活着的宪法。宪法是死的。它意味着当时社会最初的理解。<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"><br/><br/></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>不民主？这正是制定第 3 条的原因，以防止像特朗普这样专制地试图从人民手中夺走决定权的人担任公职。</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>不民主？这正是制定第 3 条的原因，以防止像特朗普这样专制地试图从人民手中夺走决定权的人担任公职。<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"><br/><br/></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>最高法院将于 2 月 8 日对此案进行口头辩论，尽管他们有右翼的倾向，但他们将很难从这一案件中脱身，并做出一个能通过笑声检验的判决。</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>最高法院将于 2 月 8 日对此案进行口头辩论，尽管他们有右翼的倾向，但他们将很难从这一案件中脱身，并做出一个能通过笑声检验的判决。<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"><br/><br/></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>詹姆斯-D-齐林（James D. Zirin）是作家和法律分析家，曾任纽约南区联邦检察官。他还是公共电视台脱口秀节目和播客《与詹姆斯-齐林对话》的主持人。<br/><br/></div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>詹姆斯-D-齐林（James D. Zirin）是作家和法律分析家，曾任纽约南区联邦检察官。他还是公共电视台脱口秀节目和播客《与詹姆斯-齐林对话》的主持人。<br/><br/></div></td></tr>
</table>
Kevin
http://www.factmatters.org:80/index.php?title=The_Hill%E3%80%90%E5%8F%96%E6%B6%88%E8%B5%84%E6%A0%BC%E8%BF%98%E6%98%AF%E4%B8%8D%E5%8F%96%E6%B6%88%E8%B5%84%E6%A0%BC%EF%BC%9A_%E6%9C%80%E9%AB%98%E6%B3%95%E9%99%A2%E9%9D%A2%E4%B8%B4_%22%E7%AC%91%E5%A3%B0%E6%B5%8B%E9%AA%8C%E2%80%9C%E3%80%91&diff=67&oldid=prev
Kevin at 00:07, 9 January 2024
2024-01-09T00:07:11Z
<p></p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 20:07, 8 January 2024</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l37">Line 37:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 37:</td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>詹姆斯-D-齐林（James D. Zirin）是作家和法律分析家，曾任纽约南区联邦检察官。他还是公共电视台脱口秀节目和播客《与詹姆斯-齐林对话》的主持人。<br/><br/></div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>詹姆斯-D-齐林（James D. Zirin）是作家和法律分析家，曾任纽约南区联邦检察官。他还是公共电视台脱口秀节目和播客《与詹姆斯-齐林对话》的主持人。<br/><br/></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>原文链接：（中文翻译出自翻译软件，全部内容须以原文为准）</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>原文链接：（中文翻译出自翻译软件，全部内容须以原文为准）<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"><br/></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>To disqualify or not to disqualify: The Supreme Court confronts the ‘laugh test’<br/></div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>To disqualify or not to disqualify: The Supreme Court confronts the ‘laugh test’<br/></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/4394601-to-disqualify-or-not-to-disqualify-the-supreme-court-confronts-the-laugh-test/</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/4394601-to-disqualify-or-not-to-disqualify-the-supreme-court-confronts-the-laugh-test/</div></td></tr>
</table>
Kevin
http://www.factmatters.org:80/index.php?title=The_Hill%E3%80%90%E5%8F%96%E6%B6%88%E8%B5%84%E6%A0%BC%E8%BF%98%E6%98%AF%E4%B8%8D%E5%8F%96%E6%B6%88%E8%B5%84%E6%A0%BC%EF%BC%9A_%E6%9C%80%E9%AB%98%E6%B3%95%E9%99%A2%E9%9D%A2%E4%B8%B4_%22%E7%AC%91%E5%A3%B0%E6%B5%8B%E9%AA%8C%E2%80%9C%E3%80%91&diff=66&oldid=prev
Kevin at 00:06, 9 January 2024
2024-01-09T00:06:44Z
<p></p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 20:06, 8 January 2024</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l38">Line 38:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 38:</td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>原文链接：（中文翻译出自翻译软件，全部内容须以原文为准）</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>原文链接：（中文翻译出自翻译软件，全部内容须以原文为准）</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>To disqualify or not to disqualify: The Supreme Court confronts the ‘laugh test’</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>To disqualify or not to disqualify: The Supreme Court confronts the ‘laugh test’<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"><br/></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/4394601-to-disqualify-or-not-to-disqualify-the-supreme-court-confronts-the-laugh-test/</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/4394601-to-disqualify-or-not-to-disqualify-the-supreme-court-confronts-the-laugh-test/</div></td></tr>
</table>
Kevin