宪政危机 Constitutional Crisis: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:53, 15 February 2024

当前位置： 首页 → 宪政危机

Truthout【最高法院在特朗普取消资格的辩论中几乎无视1月6日的判决】Supreme Court All But Ignores January 6 During Trump Disqualification Argument

Salon【新文件强调了为什么最高法院必须让杰克·史密斯的特朗普案向前推进】 | New documents underscore why the Supreme Court must let Jack Smith's Trump case move forward

Raw Story【可能取消资格法官下令就法尼-威利斯和特别检察官举行听证会】 | 'Disqualification can occur': Judge orders hearing on Fani Willis and special prosecutor

AHMED BABA【Smartmatic 揭露右翼媒体参与 2020 年大选阴谋并提起诽谤诉讼】 | Right-Wing Media’s Complicity In 2020 Election Plot Uncovered By Smartmatic & Defamation Suits

The Hill【观点-特朗普的选票删除案取决于这些关键问题】 | Trump’s ballot removal cases hinge on these key questions

Fine-Tuned Finances【法官拒绝特朗普叛乱案中的“总统豁免权”辩护】 | JUDGES REJECT ‘PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY’ DEFENSE IN TRUMP’S INSURRECTION CASE

Huffpost【共和党人正在抓稻草，宣称如果特朗普被取消选票，将进行报复】 | Republicans Are Grasping At Straws To Promise Retribution If Trump Is Taken Off The Ballot

Ahmed Baba【什么是 "2025 计划"，为什么它如此危险？】 | What Is Project 2025 And Why Is It So Dangerous?

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
   <font color="grey">当前位置：</font>[[时政文萃 | 首页]]<font color="grey"> &rarr; 宪政危机</font>
+*'''[[Truthout【最高法院在特朗普取消资格的辩论中几乎无视1月6日的判决】]][https://truthout.org/articles/supreme-court-all-but-ignores-january-6-during-trump-disqualification-hearing/ Supreme Court All But Ignores January 6 During Trump Disqualification Argument]'''
 *'''[[Salon【新文件强调了为什么最高法院必须让杰克·史密斯的特朗普案向前推进】]][https://www.salon.com/2024/02/14/new-documents-underscore-why-the-must-let-jack-smiths-case-move-forward/ &nbsp;|&nbsp;New documents underscore why the Supreme Court must let Jack Smith's Trump case move forward]'''